The European Commission has initiated a call for applications to join the AI Act Advisory Forum, aimed at fostering interdisciplinary dialogue and responsible implementation of AI regulations, while complementing the final version of its General-Purpose AI Code of Practice set to take effect in 2025.
Ongoing court cases in the US, UK, EU, and India are examining the copyright implications of generative AI, particularly regarding fair use and the legality of using copyrighted materials for AI training, highlighting the urgent need for a comprehensive legal framework to balance innovation with intellectual property rights.
Recent rulings from the Northern District of California in the cases of Kadrey v. Meta and Bartz v. Anthropic suggest that using copyrighted books for training large language models may qualify as transformative fair use, although the legality of data acquisition remains a critical factor in future litigation.
The UK government has formed a Responsible AI Advisory Panel within the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology to provide independent advice on the ethical development and deployment of AI in public services, ensuring compliance with legal standards and public interest.
In response to US export controls and concerns over illicit trade, Malaysia’s Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry has implemented immediate restrictions requiring Strategic Trade Permits for the export and transshipment of high-performance AI chips, while enhancing oversight of the data center industry to align with international standards and prevent regulatory gaps.
The deputy head of civil justice and Lord Justice Birss emphasize the need for updated accreditation for expert witnesses and guidance on the use of AI in legal processes, highlighting the implications for Civil Procedure Rules and the integrity of expert evidence in personal injury cases.
