Ziff Davis has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI in the US District Court for the District of Delaware, claiming unauthorized use of its news articles for AI training, as part of a broader trend of 41 lawsuits against AI companies that raises significant questions about the application of copyright law to emerging technologies.
The European Commission’s draft guidelines aim to provide clarity on the definition of AI systems under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), offering legal interpretations and practical examples to assist companies in compliance and influencing national authorities’ implementation across the EU.
The International Legal Technology Association has introduced a Generative AI Guide to assist legal professionals in the UK in navigating the complexities of generative AI use in litigation, aiming to standardize practices and reduce disputes in document review processes.
In January 2025, New York State introduced the New York AI Act and the New York AI Consumer Protection Act, establishing regulations to prevent algorithmic discrimination, enhance transparency, and protect consumer rights in the deployment of AI systems, with provisions for audits, lawsuits, and penalties for noncompliance.
The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA), now SB 149, establishes a framework for regulating AI systems in government agencies, promoting ethical use while addressing civil liberties and privacy concerns, amidst bipartisan support and ongoing debates about potential overreach and transparency.
Utah has implemented stringent laws governing the use of generative AI in mental health services, including requirements for transparency, user consent, and compliance with HIPAA, positioning itself as a leader in AI regulation.
