UK regulatory bodies, including the ICO, CMA, Ofcom, and FCA, are developing comprehensive frameworks for AI governance through the Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum, focusing on transparency, accountability, and compliance across various sectors.
The European Commission’s Artificial Intelligence Office has initiated a multi-stakeholder consultation to gather input on future guidelines for defining AI systems and identifying prohibited practices under the EU AI Act, which is set to be implemented in phases starting February 2025.
The Supreme Court of New South Wales, led by Chief Justice Andrew Bell, has introduced Practice Note SC GEN 23 to provide comprehensive guidelines for legal practitioners on the responsible use of generative artificial intelligence in court proceedings, emphasizing the need to maintain ethical standards and the integrity of the justice system.
The Georgia Supreme Court and the State Bar of Georgia are establishing committees to ensure the ethical integration of artificial intelligence in the legal system, focusing on technological competence and addressing associated legal and ethical challenges.
Governments, multilateral organizations, and technology companies are striving to establish accountability mechanisms and international standards for AI governance, yet a comprehensive framework is still lacking ahead of the upcoming AI Action Summit in 2025.
Asian News International has filed a defamation lawsuit against OpenAI in the Delhi High Court, alleging unauthorized use of its copyrighted content for AI training, raising significant copyright and fair use issues in the context of AI technologies.
