Recent legislative actions in New Jersey, New York, California, Colorado, Illinois, and Kentucky aim to regulate the use of AI and automated decision systems in employment, addressing algorithmic discrimination and imposing requirements for bias audits and employee notifications.
Recent legislative actions in New Jersey, New York, California, Colorado, Illinois, and Kentucky aim to regulate the use of AI and automated decision systems in employment, addressing algorithmic discrimination and imposing requirements for bias audits and employee notifications.
Newly established expert working groups in the UK, comprising representatives from major AI companies and creative industries, aim to develop solutions for the copyright challenges posed by AI technologies, focusing on transparency, consent, and the protection of creators’ rights.
Newly established expert working groups in the UK, comprising representatives from major AI companies and creative industries, aim to develop solutions for the copyright challenges posed by AI technologies, focusing on transparency, consent, and the protection of creators’ rights.
The US Copyright Office maintains that works created with substantial AI input are not eligible for copyright protection unless there is demonstrable human involvement, as reinforced by recent legal rulings including Thaler v. Perlmutter, which affirmed that non-human machines cannot be considered authors under US copyright law.
